General Pace opposes equality

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff yesterday placed his personal beliefs ahead of human decency, equality, and national security. General Pace stated that he believes homosexuality to be immoral and that gay Soldiers should continue to be subject to being fired for a condition they did not choose. What I found interesting, is that he said that adultery was also immoral (it is) but made no mention of enacting a policy to separate adulterous service members.

 

“I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way,” Pace told the newspaper in a wide-ranging interview.

Pace, a native of Brooklyn, N.Y., and a 1967 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, said he based his views on his upbringing.

He said he supports the Pentagon’s “don’t ask, don’t tell policy” in which gay men and women are allowed in the military as long as they keep their sexual orientation private. The policy, signed into law by President Clinton in 1994, prohibits commanders from asking about a person’s sexual orientation.

“I believe homosexual acts between two individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts,” Pace said.

 


You believe that homosexuality is immoral? Fine — I can deal with that. You don’t like homosexuals? I can deal with that too. You want to use your ignorant bigotry as a platform to defend a policy which continues to prove its ineffectiveness and that harms national security? Big problem. I would argue that a Soldier who cheats on his wife is less trustworthy than the Soldier who has been in a stable relationship with someone of the same gender for years.

Adultery is immoral; the General won’t get any argument from me on that. It erodes trust and potentially damages the combat effectiveness of the unit. Homosexuality’s morality is subjective and is based on a person’s belief system and has no bearing on a Soldier’s duty performance.

 

Let’s level the playing field then: I will be willing to accept DADT as a permanent policy if a new policy is enacted whereby adulterous Service Members are automatically separated from the military and barred from re-entry with no possibility of appeal. While we’re at it, let’s remember what Jesus said in Matthew 5:28: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. This means that any married Service Member who, uh, partakes in the viewing of pornography will also be subject to the adultery policy.

3 Responses

  1. Glenn

    This is what I call “selective immorality”.

  2. dw

    You might be interested in this Slate piece analyzing Pace and Undersecretary of Defense David Chu’s attitudes towards gays serving:
     http://www.slate.com/id/2161764

  3. Anonymous Soldier

    That’s an excellent article, thanks!

    I might just have to base a write-up on it.

Recent Posts

  • Veteran’s Day

    November 11th, 2008 Today needs no preamble; instead, I present UserFriendly's tribute to vets.
  • I’m back

    November 5th, 2008 I know it's been a long time since my last post, but being deployed to Iraq limited my time and opportunities to post t
  • Buck Rogers and the Planet of Zoom

    February 29th, 2008 First some background: back in late '84 or early '85, my father bought a Commodore 64 while we were stationed in Germa
  • State of Unsilence

    February 27th, 2008 Well, I thought that I'd go ahead and knuckle down and begin work on fixing the blog registration issue that Unsilence
  • The Passage of Time

    February 26th, 2008 I know it's been quite a while since I've posted anything, so I thought I'd pop back in to let everyone know that I'm d